Description:

tsutsumu 0.1.0

Tsutsumu: A Python Module Bundler and Runtime

つつむ (tsutsumu), Japanese for bundle

Tsutsumu creates Python module bundles, that is, scripts that contain many more
modules and supporting resources, and imports modules from bundles. That way,
Tsutsumu enables self-contained scripts that can run anywhere a suitable Python
interpreter is available—without creating a virtual environment or installing
packages first.
Having said that, Tsutsumu isn't the only option for more easily distributing
Python code and it may very well not be the right option for your use case.
Notably, the standard library's
zipapp also compresses
bundled files and pex files further combine
bundling with virtual environments. That makes them more sophisticated but also
significantly more heavyweight. Tsutsumu's simplicity makes it best suited to
scripts that import a few dozen modules at most and should remain easily
readable and inspectable before execution.
The rest of this document covers Tsutsumu thusly:

Just Download and
Run!
Make a Bundle
The Workings of a
Bundle

Layout of Bundled
Files
A Bundle's Manifest: Offsets and
Lengths
On-Disk vs
In-Memory
Meta-Circular
Bundling
importlib.resources Considered
Harmful
Add a Resource Manifest
Instead


Still Missing

1. Just Download and Run!
There is nothing to install. There is no virtual environment to set up. Just
download this one Python
script
and run it:
% curl -o tsutsumu.py \
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apparebit/tsutsumu/boss/bundles/bundler.py"
% python tsutsumu.py -h
usage: tsutsumu [-h] [-b] [-m MODULE] [-o FILENAME] [-r] [-v]
PKGROOT [PKGROOT ...]

Combine Python modules and related resources into a single,
...

Yup. I used Tsutsumu to bundle its own modules into bundler.py. As a result,
getting started with Tsutsumu is as easy as downloading a file and running it.
Bundled scripts can be this easy and convenient!
The Complicated Route Still Works
But just in case that you prefer to take the slow and familiar route, you can do
that, too. It just requires 3.5 times more command invocations and takes quite a
bit longer. But sure, here you go:
% mkdir tsutsumu
% cd tsutsumu
% python -m venv .venv
% source .venv/bin/activate
(.venv) % pip install --upgrade pip
(.venv) % pip install tsutsumu
(.venv) % python -m tsutsumu -h
usage: tsutsumu [-h] [-b] [-m MODULE] [-o FILENAME] [-r] [-v]
PKGROOT [PKGROOT ...]

Combine Python modules and related resources into a single,
...

So how about bundling your Python modules?
2. Make a Bundle
The only challenge in making a bundle is in selecting the right directories for
inclusion. Right now, you need to list every package that should be included in
the bundle as a separate directory argument to Tsutsumu. Alas, for most Python
tools and applications, that's just the list of regular dependencies. While
module-level tree-shaking might still be desirable, automating package selection
based on a project's pyproject.toml is an obvious next step.
When Tsutsumu traverses provided directories, it currently limits itself to a
few textual formats based on file extension. In particular, it includes plain
text, Markdown, ReStructured Text, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and most importantly
Python sources. Out of these, Tsutsumu only knows how to execute Python code.
The other files serve as resources. Adding support for Base85-encoded binary
formats seems like another obvious next step.
3. The Workings of a Bundle
This section is a hands-on exploration of Tsutsumu's inner workings. Its
implementation is split across the following modules:

tsutsumu for Tsutsumu's __version__ and nothing else;
tsutsumu.__main__ for the main() entry point and command line interface;
tsutsumu.debug for validating the manifest and contents of bundle scripts;
tsutsumu.maker for generating bundles with the BundleMaker class;
tsutsumu.bundle for importing from bundles with the Bundle class.

As that breakdown should make clear, tsutsumu.maker and tsutsumu.bundle
provide the critical two classes that do all the heavy lifting. Hence I'll be
focusing on them in this section. To illustrate their workings, I rely on the
spam package also contained in Tsutsumu's source repository. In addition to
its own __init__ package module, the package contains two Python modules,
__main__ and bacon, as well as a very stylish webpage, ham.html.
All subsequent code examples have been validated with Python's doctest tool.
Running the tool over this file is part of Tsutsumu's test
suite.
Let's get started making a bundle with the contents of the spam directory:
>>> import tsutsumu.maker
>>> maker = tsutsumu.maker.BundleMaker(['spam'])
>>> maker
<tsutsumu-maker spam>
>>>

The bundle maker ultimately needs to produce a Python script. To get there, the
bundle maker processes data from byte to file granularity, which is quite the
spread. At the same time, it's easy enough to format strings that are entire
lines and, similarly, break down larger blobs into individual lines. Hence, most
bundle maker methods treat the source line as the common unit of abstraction.
However, since files are stored as byte string, not character strings, and byte
counts do matter, those source lines are bytes, not str, and include
newlines, just \n.
Having said that, the bundle maker starts out by iterating over the contents of
directories, yielding the files to be bundled. For each such file, it yields an
operating-system-specific Path—suitable for reading the file's contents from
the local file system—as well as a relative str key with forward slashes—for
identifying the file in the bundle's manifest. Here are the bundle maker's keys
for spam:
>>> files = list(sorted(maker.list_files(), key=lambda f: f.key))
>>> for file in files:
... print(file.key)
...
spam/__init__.py
spam/__main__.py
spam/bacon.py
spam/ham.html
>>>

Those are just the four files we expect:

spam/__init__.py contains spam's package module;
spam/__main__.py is the package's main entry point;
spam/bacon.poy contains the spam.bacon submodule;
spam/ham.html is a package resource.

3.1 Layout of Bundled Files
Now that we know which files to include in the bundle, we can turn to their
layout in bundle scripts. The current format tries to reconcile two
contradictory requirements: First, the layout must be valid Python source code.
That pretty much limits us to string literals for file names and contents.
Furthermore, since the collection of file names and contents obviously forms a
mapping, we might as well use a dict literal for the file data.
Second, the code must not retain the bundled data. Otherwise, all bundled files
are loaded into memory at startup and remain there for the duration of the
application's runtime. Ideally, the Python runtime doesn't even instantiate the
dict literal and just scans for its end. To facilitate that, the bundle script
does not assign the dict literal to a variable and, on top of that, includes
it only inside an if False: branch.
>>> writeall = tsutsumu.maker.BundleMaker.writeall
>>> writeall(tsutsumu.maker._BUNDLE_START_IFFY.splitlines(keepends=True))
if False: {
>>>

I'm not sure whether CPython actually takes this use case into account during
parsing. In fact, I'd be surprised if it did. However, I also do know that
Donald Knuth's TeX (which dates back to the late 1970s) does optimize just this
case: Once TeX knows that a conditional branch is not taken, it scans upcoming
tokens, taking only \if (and variations thereof), \else, and \fi into
account, until it has found the end of the branch, resuming regular processing
thereafter.
In the hope that Python is just as clever, we next emit the dictionary contents
as file name, content pairs for each bundled file. We start with
spam/__init__.py:
>>> writeall(maker.emit_text_file(*files[0]))
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"spam/__init__.py": b"print('spam/__init__.py')\n",
>>>

As illustrated above, the file name or key is a str literal, whereas the file
contents are a bytes literal. The latter is more appropriate for file contents
because files store bytestrings, too. That means that bundle maker is yielding
lines of bytestrings that contain string and bytestring literals both. Ooh...
Let's process the other three files:
>>> writeall(maker.emit_text_file(*files[1]))
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"spam/__main__.py":
b"""print('spam/__main__.py')
import spam.bacon
<BLANKLINE>
print('also:', __file__)
""",
>>> writeall(maker.emit_text_file(*files[2]))
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"spam/bacon.py": b"print('spam/bacon.py')\n",
>>> writeall(maker.emit_text_file(*files[3]))
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"spam/ham.html":
b"""<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang=en>
<meta charset=utf-8>
<title>Ham?</title>
<style>
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
display: grid;
justify-content: center;
align-content: center;
}
p {
font-family: system-ui, sans-serif;
font-size: calc(32vmin + 4vmax);
font-weight: bolder;
}
</style>
<p>Ham!
""",
>>>

Now we can close the dictionary again:
>>> writeall(tsutsumu.maker._BUNDLE_STOP.splitlines(keepends=True))
}
<BLANKLINE>
>>>

3.2 A Bundle's Manifest: Offsets and Lengths
A bundle's files are encoded as a dict literal by design—so that the script
parses—but are not assigned to any variable by design as well—so that the
script does not retain access to the data, which would only increase memory
pressure. So if the script doesn't retain a reference to the data, how does
it access the data when it's needed?
I've already hinted at the solution: While turning file names and contents into
yielded lines of the bundle script, the bundle maker tracks the byte offset and
length of each content literal. It helps that the bundle maker is implemented as
a class with several methods that are generators instead of as a bunch of
generator functions. That way, accumulating state while yielding lines only
requires another method call, with the state stored by the bundle maker
instance. It also helps that the bundle maker emits bundle contents first, at
the beginning of the content script and that it relies on named string constants
for the boilerplate before, between, and right after the file contents
dictionary.
Once the bundle maker is done with the file contents, it emits the manifest
with the offset and length for each file included in the bundle:
>>> writeall(maker.emit_manifest())
# ==============================================================================
<BLANKLINE>
__manifest__ = {
"spam/__init__.py": (305, 30),
"spam/__main__.py": (438, 77),
"spam/bacon.py": (615, 27),
"spam/ham.html": (742, 382),
}
>>>

The data collected while yielding the file contents is one datum more granular
than offset and length. But the generator for the manifest consumes the output
of another generator that accumulates the original three length values per file.
As you can see, Tsutsumu's not so secret sauce are generator functions and
methods!
Tsutsumu's source repository does not just include the spam package. But its
so far tiny collection of prebundled
scripts includes
can.py, which already bundles the package. If you check can.py's contents,
you should see the exact same files in the same order with the same offsets and
lengths. That means that we can use the bundle to illustrate how the bundle
runtime reads a file such as spam/bacon.py:
>>> with open('bundles/can.py', mode='rb') as file:
... _ = file.seek(615)
... data = file.read(27)
...
>>> data
b'b"print(\'spam/bacon.py\')\\n"'
>>>

As you can see, the returned bytes aren't just the file contents, but also the
leading and trailing characters necessary for turning the contents into a valid
Python bytestring literal. We need those "decorations" in the script, so that
Python knows to parse the bytestring. But why read those extra characters?
Python bytestring literals represent 256 values per byte with ASCII characters
only. As a result, some code points necessarily require escape sequences. In
fact, there are more code points that require escaping than printable ASCII
characters. Nonetheless, this is a reasonable encoding for this domain because
Python source code draws on ASCII mostly and remains human-readable under the
encoding.
Still, we can't escape escape sequences—as the above example illustrates. Notice
the trailing \\n? That's an escaped newline taking up two bytes in the
bytestring. So why read a bytestring, as indicated by the leading b',
containing a bytestring literal, as indicated by the subsequent b", when we
really want proper bytes?
Here's why:
>>> eval(data)
b"print('spam/bacon.py')\n"
>>>

It only takes an eval to turn two consecutive bytestring prefixes and
backslash characters into one each, producing real bytes.
3.3 On-Disk vs In-Memory
As presented so far, bundled files are named by relative paths with forward
slashes. That makes sense for bundle scripts while they are inert and being
distributed. After all, the raison d'être for Tsutsumu's bundle scripts is to be
easily copied to just about any computer and run right there. That wouldn't be
practical if the names used in the bundle were tied to the originating file
system or limited to some operating system only.
However, the naming requirements change fundamentally the moment a bundle starts
to execute on some computer. That instance should seamlessly integrate with the
local Python runtime and operating system, while also tracking provenance, i.e.,
whether modules originate from the bundle or from the local machine. In other
words, a running bundle uses absolute paths with the operating system's path
segment separator. Sure enough, the constructor for tsutsumu.bundle.Bundle
performs the translation from relative, system-independent paths to absolute,
system-specific paths by joining the absolute path to the bundle script with
each key.
Let's see how that plays out in practice on the example of the can.py bundle:
>>> import bundles.can
>>> manifest = bundles.can.__manifest__
>>> for key in manifest.keys():
... print(key)
...
spam/__init__.py
spam/__main__.py
spam/bacon.py
spam/ham.html
>>>

Clearly, the __manifest__ is using relative paths.
Since bundles.can isn't __main__, importing the bundle resulted in the
definition of the __manifest__ dictionary and the Bundle class but it did
not install a new Bundle instance in the module loading machinery. Before we
manually install the bundle, there's a bit of housekeeping to do. We need to cut
off our ability to load modules from the regular file system. Otherwise, we
might inadvertently import the spam package from its sources and get mightily
confused. (Not that that ever happened to me...)
>>> bundles.can.Bundle.restrict_sys_path()
>>> import spam
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'spam'
>>>

No more readily available spam? Time to open bundles.can:
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> can_path = Path('.').absolute() / 'bundles' / 'can.py'
>>> version = bundles.can.__version__
>>> can_content = bundles.can.Bundle.install(can_path, manifest, version)
>>> import spam
spam/__init__.py
>>>

W00t, our supply of spam is secured. That's great. But how does it work? What
did Bundle.install() do exactly?
Well, a Bundle is what importlib's documentation calls an importer, a
class that is both a meta path finder and a loader. When Python tries to
load a module that hasn't yet been loaded, it (basically) invokes
find_spec(name) on each object in sys.meta_path, asking that meta path
finder whether it recognizes the module. If the meta path finder does, it
returns a description of the module. Most fields of that spec are just
informative, i.e., strings, but one field, surprisingly called loader, is an
object with methods for loading and executing the module's Python code. It just
happens that Bundle does not delegate to a separate class for loading but does
all the work itself.
In short, Bundle.install() creates a new Bundle() and makes that bundle the
first entry of sys.meta_path.
Ok. But what about the bundle using absolute paths?
>>> for key in can_content._manifest.keys():
... path = Path(key)
... assert path.is_absolute()
... print(str(path.relative_to(can_path)).replace('\\', '/'))
...
spam/__init__.py
spam/__main__.py
spam/bacon.py
spam/ham.html
>>>

Clearly, the installed can_content bundle is using absolute paths. Also, each
key now starts with the bundle script's path, which we recreated in CAN. While
we usually don't worry much about these paths when importing modules in Python,
we do need to use them when loading resources from a package:
>>> data = can_content.get_data(can_path / 'spam' / 'ham.html')
>>> data[-5:-1]
b'Ham!'
>>>

Ham! it is.
My apologies to vegetarians. You probably are tired of all this ham-fisted humor
by now. So let's make sure we stop right here:
>>> can_content.uninstall()
>>> import spam.bacon
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'spam.bacon'
>>>

Alas, already imported modules are much harder to expunge. In fact, it may just
be impossible. In this case, however, it is feasible:
>>> import sys
>>> 'spam' in sys.modules
True
>>> import spam
>>> del sys.modules['spam']
>>> 'spam' in sys.modules
False
>>> import spam
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'spam'
>>>

3.4 Meta-Circular Bundling
Tsutsumu can bundle any application that is not too large and written purely in
Python. That includes itself. Tsutsumu can bundle itself because it avoids the
file system when including its own tsutsumu/bundle.py in the bundle script.
Instead, it uses the module loader's get_data() method, which is designed for
accessing packaged resources and whose use I just demonstrated.
One drawback of Tsutsumu treating its own source code just like other Python
files is the effective duplication of tsutsumu/bundle.py, once as part of the
bundled files and once as part of the bundle script itself. While that may be
desirable, for example, when experimenting with a new version of Tsutsumu, it
also wastes almost 8 kb. To avoid that overhead, you can use the
-r/--repackage command line option when bundling Tsutsumu. Under that
option, Tsutsumu special cases the tsutsumu and tsutsumu.bundle modules and
recreates them during startup—with tsutsumu's bundle attribute referencing
the tsutsumu.bundle module and tsutsumu.bundle's Bundle attribute
referencing the corresponding class.
3.5 importlib.resources Considered Harmful
While Tsutsumu does support Loader.get_data(), it does not support the more
recent Loader.get_resource_reader() and probably never will. The API simply is
too complex for what it does, i.e., providing yet another way of traversing a
hierarchy of directory-like and file-like entities. Furthermore, the
documentation's claims about the benefits of integration with Python's import
machinery seem farfetched at best.
A look at the 8 (!) modules implementing importlib.resources in the standard
library bears this out: In addition to the documented ResourceReader,
Traversable, and TraversableReader abstract classes, there are undocumented
FileReader, ZipReader, and NamespaceReader implementations, the
SimpleReader fallback implementation, and the CompatibilityFiles adapter.
Furthermore, since Traversable is designed to have "a subset of pathlib.Path
methods," the code in importlib.resources makes heavy use of the Path
implementations provided by pathlib and zipfile. Taken together, that's a
lot of code for exposing a hierarchy of directory- and file-like entities.
Worse, despite the documentation's claims to the contrary, none of this code
leverages core importlib machinery—besides hanging off loaders and hence
touching on ModuleType and ModuleSpec. In fact, it doesn't even integrate
with the previous resource API, the much simpler get_data() method on loaders.
In summary, importlib.resources does not offer what it claims and is far too
complex for what it offers. It should be scrapped!
3.6 Add a Resource Manifest Instead
When you compare the two ways of accessing resources, Loader.get_data() and
Loader.get_resource_reader(), the latter obviously wins on traversing a
package's namespace. But that's a non-feature when it comes to resource access.
When code needs a resource, it shouldn't need to search for the resource by
searching them all, it should be able to just access the resource, possibly
through one level of indirection. In other words, if a package's resources may
vary, the package should include a resource manifest at a well-known location,
say, manifest.toml relative to the package's path. Once the package includes a
manifest, Loader.get_data() more than suffices for retrieving resources.
Loader.get_resource_reader() only adds useless complexity.
4. Still Missing
I believe that Tsutsumu is ready for real-world use. However, since it hasn't
seen wide usage, I'd hold off on mission-critical deployments for now.
Meanwhile, Tsutsumu could use a few more features. I can think of three:

Automatically determine module dependencies
Support inclusion of binary files in bundles
Support the bundling of namespace packages

What else?

Tsutsumu is © 2023 Robert Grimm and has been released
under the Apache 2.0 license.

License

For personal and professional use. You cannot resell or redistribute these repositories in their original state.

Share

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter